Show HN: Annie – An Uncensored AI Girlfriend
virtugf.com
It's my first side project which I launched publicly, so I would really appreciate your feedback!
virtugf.com
It's my first side project which I launched publicly, so I would really appreciate your feedback!
I will freely admit I'm way outside of the target market and maybe I'm badly out-of-touch with what modern men need to feel fulfilled. I'm past a decade of marriage at this point and haven't been consistently girlfriendless since I was starting out high school 30 years ago. But when I think back over the decades about what makes having a human partner gratifying and worthwhile, it certainly isn't exchanging text messages or even photographs. Even aside from physical contact and consistently having sex when possible, you've got starting a family, sharing responsibilities for taking care of a mutually owned household, a person to experience things with over an entire lifetime who you consistently feel you can count on and rely upon if it comes to it. My wife went through serious alcoholism problems for a while, losing a job and becoming hospitalized twice. I went though severe spinal degeneration in my 30s and couldn't even consistently dress myself for a few years. I don't know if either of us would have gotten through it without the other. There is simply no replacement when going through hardship like this for having another human who loves you that you know you can rely upon no matter how hard circumstances get.
What you get out of long-term human social bonding is just not something you can replace with an LLM, no matter how good they get.
> What you get out of long-term human social bonding is just not something you can replace with an LLM, no matter how good they get.
Most of my interactions with friends and family are via text messaging. I have close friends that I haven't seen in person for ages because they moved across the country/world and getting to visit all of them is expensive. I realize that not everyone socializes like I do, but for the contingent of people who do, I wouldn't be surprised if this is sufficient, especially as a replacement for those ancillary friends that you just chat about hobbies with.
Maybe i am too old. Does the name Alice says anything to you ?
but yeah, the need for privacy is oddly intertwined with AI features.
Also dumping the flash* contents out with JTAG. And even better than that, physically disabling the network interfaces completely and not ever connecting the device to the Internet at all.
* = also the eMMC controller internal firmware, this is where a sophisticated implant will likely reside
It's also very unlikely that the hardware would be compromised, the government doesn't want to waste a potentially high value exploit on ordinary people. If they do, they risk having their exploit captured and exposed, and thus wasting it.
Other GPTs? I guess they get lonely too
It doesn't matter if you think that gender is innate, fixed, immutable, strictly binary, mandated by god, or socially acquired, fluid, in a spectrum: if you designed a machine to act as a representative of some definition of a gender it will act like that, unless you also teach it to be fluid and able to adapt to your wishes. What machines do or can do is independent from what humans do or can do because we are just been constructed differently
This is incredibly far removed from how LLMs actually work. Part of me is tempted to accept the challenge you've laid down (intentionally or not), and attempt to convince "Annie" here that despite its creator's intent, it is actually a boy. Given my experience with prompt injection, this should be trivial. The other part of me doesn't care enough to follow through on installing telegram much less interact with a bot over it.
My point is that the two things and not strictly related and you cannot make conclusions about humans just because you know something about LLMs or the converse. Since concepts like gender are to be understood within a context of humans I find sentences like "since gender is a social construct in humans then it follows that it must be a social construct in LLMs and necessarily easily changeable" to be fallacious logic
Anyway. Good idea, but no way I’m messaging this thing on Telegram.
I think that this sort of thing is more likely to make loneliness worse, not better.
> Girls have easy options for immediate companionship - just jump on any dating app and swipe right once.
What? I suppose so, if what you're thinking of is just hooking up without concern for partner quality. If, however, what they want is an actual companion, it's no easier for women than for men (and I've heard many women make persuasive cases that it's harder for women.)
What are some examples of that?
This isn't a complaint I hear men make about women.
But that's not proof that the claim by women that things are harder for them is true. :/
This ignores the very significant potential risks to personal safety which are simply much higher for women meeting new potential partners than for men. In addition to the stated distinction between companionship and casual coupling.
At least right now an AI bot can't
- pretend emotional investment to get sex
- lose its shit and harass you over message and at work when the relationship ends
- pressure you into coming over after meeting for coffee and repeatedly insist around you declining
- demand nudes and pout/manipulate if they don't get them
- anything else in the big bag of tricks any women in your circle could tell you about that requires being a thinking, communicating human being with the capacity for manipulation and selfishness
I've seen smarmy remarks online by men who seem convinced that AI girlfriends will really show these human women what's what, and we'll be so upset about the competition. No, please, if there was a digital resource toxic people could demand companionship from instead that might save the rest of us from it.
Of course, until an AI bot can also do the dishes and the laundry, I don't think they'll be much competition to the relationships those sorts of men seek with women.
It’s more interesting to know how they are handling the privacy in the application itself.
That statement can be viewed in many ways. ;)
I spend about $0.30 - $0.50 per day per user (8 - 10 messages). Twilio is around $0.08 - $0.10 per message to send because the fee isn't per message but per segment. MMS without doubt will explode that cost.
Not to mention if you go on SMS, you have to pay $10+ plus a monthly fee to "validate your identity" plus the ~$1 per month per number.
This is entirely before you discuss platform risk especially with Twilio wanting to go mainstream and investor-friendly. All it takes is one news story and Twilio starts kicking people off platform for "adult content".
If I was designing this kind of system, I would probably just use like websockets or some other out of the box chat functionality. You'd basically be in the same privacy situation as you are right now (creator can see what you send and receive).
If you want to pursue this as a full-on business, you should consider upselling into 'private instances' or other privacy-increasing measures. I'd imagine you'd find people willing to buy the "v1" for hundreds of dollars + hosting costs if it was good enough.
---
Oh, and just wanted to encourage you to ignore the "why Telegram".
It's fine. Your audience isn't really HN. We are just here for the tech and startup discussions. Your audience is the 99.999% of people who will go "Oh sick, an AI girlfriend right where I already am!"
I've tried to build for HN-like audiences and it sucks because 1) most of them will just build it themselves or want to run it themselves (ie: not friendly to closed source SaaS) 2) they will not give up their data at all costs (for good and valid reason).
Just write HN and all tech people out of your ICP unless you are selling B2B or prosumer and even then you'll probably not want to sell directly to them but to their bosses.
Holy Crap! Out of all the AI project so far I think this category has potentially the biggest threat ( or changes ) to human kind. And why did I not think of this in all the AI Debate.
It reminds me of all the Anime and Sci-Fic. How far are we from a Dating Game made with AI GirlFriend or BoyFriend with In-App purchase. The potential to make this even more addictive than gambling.
I really hope society stops fussing so much about what other people do in the bedroom.
But I mean, the conservatives are getting very concerned with people being trans, credit card services are cutting off anything that's even remotely "spicy" etc, this is what I mean.
But I'm in Europe, I've never even visited the US. Perhaps things are different there. But I doubt that because the whole credit card thing is coming from there.
... and undiscovered mental illnesses. Boy this is some dangerous stuff you're unleashing to the public.