It is difficult to find a good solution for this, even providing 3 ranges (city, suburban, highway) has its limits and will confuse people.
But anyway my point is that this combined number is meaningless and unhelpful even in that case. Highway provides a minimum number. Any other test just produces confusion and disappointment.
... Or if the stakes are high enough, building their own "test track".
I simply do not understand why a comprehensive set of basic tests aren’t performed, and I assume that’s my own ignorance. But I’ll say my opinion anyways… It’s not like creating a new car doesn’t cost a billion dollars. Is it really unreasonable to have a test suite that gives consumers accurate information across a spectrum of driving conditions?
AND that would FINALLY represent a significant gate to “cheating on the test” as it wouldn’t create the “single test” paradigm that’s clearly not possible for manufacturers to follow.
0: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/ref_mats/fhwasa16076/fh...
39 out of 50 (or 51, if you count DC as state-like) states have maximum posted speed limits of 70mph or higher, which is a very clear majority.