First Private Mission to Venus
rocketlabusa.com
rocketlabusa.com
We've all heard that surface pressure is 80 atmospheres with temperatures that can melt lead (due to high carbon dioxide and powerful greenhouse effect), but I never thought about the temperature and pressure gradient with altitude. Great project to raise awareness of space, and cool judo move against all the interest in Mars
From [1]:
> According to measurements by the Magellan and Venus Express probes, the altitude from 52.5 to 54 km has a temperature between 293 K (20 °C) and 310 K (37 °C), and the altitude at 49.5 km above the surface is where the pressure becomes the same as Earth at sea level
E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Altitude_Venus_Operationa...
If those pictures look familiar, it's likely because you grew up in the 70s and read that book, then forgot about it for the next 35 years.
It is possible to build cloud cities on Venus at 50km altitude. The question is: why? What are you going to do there exactly? There's no economic incentive at all, since you can't mine the surface for anything valuable. Who's going to pay for some people to live in a floating colony so far away, one that's completely reliant on resources from Earth to sustain it? At least with Mars, it's somewhat plausible (though not really) to build a mostly self-sustaining colony, and there might (probably not) be some resources worth mining and sending back to Earth.
Personally, I think the idea of terraforming planets in this system is just silly and a waste of time to even think about. If you want resources, go to the Moon, and work on capturing and mining asteroids. If you want to make places for people to live that aren't so far away and don't have so many challenges, just build O'neill cylinders. You can keep them close to Earth for easy transit, and build them to precisely replicate Earth-normal habitats unlike terraforming projects. O'neill cylinders may seem like unrealistic sci-fi tech, but they're far more realistic and doable than these terraforming projects.
The only place terraforming really makes sense if where there's a planet with similar conditions to Earth: similar mass, day/night cycle, temperature, etc. Such a planet doesn't exist in this system. It might exist in another system, but just traveling to another star system is probably harder than building an O'neill cylinder.
The other thing that might make sense for a habitat is hollowing out a small asteroid and then spinning it for spin-gravity, as was depicted in The Expanse (with Eros).
This article [0] from September 2022 mention a planned launched in May 2023. Now they say January 2025.
Is it a publicity stunt?
Apparently, their working on this on their spare time:
> According to the head of Rocket Lab Peter Beck, the mission to Venus is a project that is carried out by the company at night and on weekends. It is constantly pushed into the background, but engineers continue to work on it. [1]
How serious is this thing?
[0] https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/3636322-rocket-lab-to...
[1] https://universemagazine.com/en/rocket-lab-announces-a-new-l...
Demonstrating this sort of capability would probably be great marketing.
What exactly is going to sit in the atmosphere of Venus? What does it look like? When does it launch?