RawJS library author here.

What I meant was that it's a small library with a relatively small surface area for bugs, and it's been under pressure from a few different projects for some time now, and it's been quite a while since we have discovered any behaviour I would consider to be buggy.

I'm sorry you took this as a "brag". This wasn't the intention.

"no known bugs" is technically the same as "may contain unknown bugs"

Author(s) of this may be the type of people to not use a library because it has a lot of open github issues

could be rewritten as "0 open bug reports".