I'm genuinely disappointed by the predictability of encountering negativity and criticism towards new programming languages, even when the cynics represent a small minority. My address is to those who tend to be critical, cynical, and skeptical. It particularly troubles me when individuals adopt an air of entitlement and phrase their questions as, "Why should I use this? Prove its value to me." I would like to propose that this approach runs counter to the hacker ethos, as it immediately puts such questions in a negative light. There are constructive and useful ways to inquire about new languages, but all too often, I witness people ridiculing and deriding the work that others have shared. If this were our reaction to every new (even experimental) endeavor within the hacker and broader community, we would miss out on exploring fascinating possibilities. Many, if not most, of the technologies we use today began as small kernels or mere experiments. Through the dedication of individuals or small groups of passionate people, they evolved into essential components of our technology stacks. So, while it's perfectly valid to inquire about the compelling features of a language or why one might choose to use it, there are ways to frame such questions without sounding cynical and derisive.