Nothing will ever replace that magic time but HN comes close. Thank you guys happy new year HN!
Btw, open invite. Contact info in profile.
Indeed, the only third place I feel worth participating in (for me of course, ymmv) and enjoy. Appreciate y’all. Thank you dang for all of the hard work.
can you elaborate?
Meet up to play a tabletop game?
Go for a hike?
Have a group receive a tech presentation once a quarter?
Lots of options, most just take your time and emails/contacting possibly interested folks.
You could go out to lunch and have a technical chat and the people at the table next to you might chime in with a solution!
When you get enough passionate people and pack them into one location things get interesting for them (networking, friendships etc)... Much of the passion is gone (lots of people see tech as a path to a paycheck), and everyone wants to WFH.
Honest truth is there were always folks without passion in tech.
People have lost the vision and do not understand the soul of the machine is to improve our state of existence not enslave us further.
Fuck 'em. I'm taking the money and doing what makes me feel good (wine, floozies and travel).
Would also suggest looking for social clubs. I've found the "general social hangouts + minimal focus on a shared interest" are great for people time.
Avoids the monomaniacal over-focus of a single-interest activity, while still providing a bridge with random strangers ("You like thing? I like thing!").
As long as they're happy to talk when you call, or they show up at the group event when you badger them enough: that's fine. Some people are just not initiators, and it's either you make the effort, or you lose touch with them. You can't insist on reciprocity.
anyway i'm surviving and happy new year [+2 days] nerds!!!!!!!11
you mean, are they really good friends or not? One is always reassessing that, I guess.
Notably, that doesn't mean that the person who initiates less doesn't value your company! (Of course, it also doesn't mean that they do value you, only that the frequency of initiation is not a good proxy for the health of the relationship.)
it may not give a 100% accurate picture. but it's certainly one of the variables that plays into the health of the relationship.
Now I am the initiator most of the times.
In today's info overload overwhelming reality, its natural that lot of people are going to disconnect.
If I am the person giving and the other person is just the one that takes, without giving back anything, then nope, I am leaving that relationship for reasons that should be obvious. Another term to call the "takers" would be "leech" or "parasite". It does not sound good now, does it?
If you look at your algorithm's ROC: you really want to avoid false negatives ("nope, not a real friend" when they actually could be).
Whereas a false positive ("yep, could be a real friend" and they turn out not to be) is something you will notice & correct eventually.