>in fact, for example, wildlife around Chernobyl has flourished
This can't be serious...
This can't be serious...
Bearing in mind that coal plants have a lot of negative health effects, so there needs to be an argument that life in the exclusion zone would be detectable worse than life near a coal plant.
Is it the kind of wildlife you want as a pet?
Is it the kind of wildlife you want to eat?
No, this is not actually a good thing.