Hacker News Reader

That makes sense, would you agree to the revised statement:

"We already know Apple cooperated with the spy agencies behind the publics back"?

No, I won’t agree to context free blanket statements which are specifically worded to imply something which is simply not provably true, especially given evidence to the opposite. If you knew anything about PRISM at all, even the technical details publicly available with the minimalist of effort on your part, you wouldn’t be asking.

The struggle itself is a clue, nobody takes time out of their day to defend Apple and PRISM on the Internet. Opsec needs enhancement.

> nobody takes time out of their day to defend Apple and PRISM on the Internet

I’m definitely not defending Apple to be clear. I just believe facts matter, especially when it involves security topics. Parroting around misleading and/or straight false statements related to security topics does nobody any good.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com