Regurgitating explanations isn't useful, following problem solving patterns is. So to learn from this article it would need to see the kind of thinking required to write the article.
Regurgitating explanations isn't useful, following problem solving patterns is. So to learn from this article it would need to see the kind of thinking required to write the article.
Thoughts -> Action -> Thoughts
Thoughts are generated by brain. You don't control how the neurons are fired in the brain. As far as you are concerened you experience the thoughts, the sounds, images etc which.
So what exactly is the point of this article?
Maybe we could make LLM training do such things in the future, but it doesn't do it today and it is hard to do that in practice since generating examples on the fly for descriptions isn't easy to do in an intelligent way. I think that is a core part of generalizing knowledge so probably one of the keys we need to get to AGI.