Hacker News Reader

Comment by verbify | Hacker News Reader

> I chose to not use the category of “Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing”, because it would include manufacturers of navigation systems (Garmin, etc.), which aren’t really what would come into my mind when I think of “tech companies”.

I very much think of Garmin as a tech company.

View on HN

Thanks for saving me a click. Yeah, a product whose algorithm has to account for the general theory of relativity is no technical match for hooking up the Shopify API to my web store. Yes, I’m being dismissive, but come…on.

Do you think the average engineer at Garmin is spending their time thinking about the algorithms to interpret GPS signals?

What difference would that make to the question at hand? Do you think the average engineer at Microsoft gives a whole lot of thought to Windows kernel development?

But to answer your question directly: I would have no idea. Do you?

As a former Garmin employee, a surprising number actually do.

I think the point is about if they are a tech company… and they are very literally a software and hardware company. It’s not a question of what the average engineers day to day is.

Which Garmin products require an engineer at Garmin to account for general relativity? Lots of products have GPS, but they use an off the shelf mixed signal IC that contains all the hardware and software required to implement GPS. As an engineer, you just feed augmentation data from a web API and receive a text stream of NMEA messages from the IC. It's literally glue code. The required skill set is the same one required to hook up the Shopify API to a web store (ie. "Software Engineer")

Would you consider a shop that sells GPS trackers a tech company too?

I understand that we quickly take this stuff for granted, but I can't imagine categorizing a company building digital navigation systems and devices, which depend on a constellation of satellites encircling the earth, as "not a tech company".

People don't think of the embedded systems category as "tech", but they should. When your car has 100 CPUs in it, it's in the tech category at least as much as in the auto category.

Exactly. Making of a navigation system seems much more technical than making a web-based shop (amazon.com).

Make sense. Maybe I am just not very familiar with their lines of products. Let me come up with a more niche example.

Yes, I stopped reading here.

Spoiler alert, there's only one more sentence after this, and it's of the "please like and subscribe" ilk, not any sort of conclusion.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com