The end of Windows 10 support could turn 240M PCs into e-waste
canalys.com
canalys.com
"Luckily, alternative operating systems are available to breath new life into these devices, such at the Ubuntu OS which come pre-loaded on some Dell computers."
Windows 11 or 12 is what they'll get when they buy a new one one day.
Never again, Microsoft.
The fact that the most rich and powerful businesses on the planet are not required to do this just makes angry. If we seriously want to do something about the environment sh*t like this windows 11 thing should not be legal period.
This is a weird way to shame Microsoft, who traditionally, has very long support cycles. Plus they gave free upgrades from Windows 8 to Windows 10 and Windows 10 to Windows 11, no subscription required.
It’s much more accurately described as a foothold for all the other products. From Office and Sharepoint to the multi-figure licenses on the big business products, it’s all resting on the fact that Windows is used by future employees who then become managers who then become C-levels.
Seeing it through the lens of the product for consumers, free security updates can be MS giving a gift to the original purchasers. But seen through the lens of a foothold the free updates are a marketing expense so that maintainers of legacy systems have just enough reason to backburner investigating non-Windows operating systems as replacements.
With regards to businesses, very few use PCs older than 8 years old and if that is the case, they likely dont care about EoL either.
Which isn’t totally wrong; these are devices which would probably never run anything other than some version of Windows. But this article could be written at any time, with any version of Windows, and any $SCARYLARGE number of affected PCs.
> But this article could be written at any time, with any version of Windows
Completely wrong. Previously you always could install the newer Windows. It might be slow, but it'd work. Microsoft has now gone out of their way to specifically forbid installing Windows 11 on old hardware so they can enforce DRM.
The only reason for any of this is because someone managed to convince microsoft that they should only support hardware with a modern TPM which the typical user will not benefit from. Instead it benefits those who wish to push DRM and "trusted computing", which is not the end user.
And even if they did say the computers would have an artifically limited lifespan: It's bullshit. It works fine. The greedy bigcorps just want more $$$ so they exploit you.
Not that this personally affects me, since I've been running Linux for years.
Not really. You can't run XP on a 386. It requires the Pentium instruction set.
Minimum requirements really do exist. It's not only about speed.
Windows has always had published minimum requirements and actual minimim requirements.
A 286 will run Windows 3, but not Windows 95 or NT.
A 486 will run Windows 2000 slowly, but I'm pretty sure you need a Pentium for XP (wikipedia says Pentium 233 Mhz).
There's plenty of examples of increased requirements over time. The TPM requirement may be different in character, as it's simple to bypass and Windows 11 then reportedly runs fine, but it's certainly prescendented that some equipment that ran the old version can't run the new version.
Windows 8 and later updates of Windows 7 require SSE2. Windows 8.1 can be ignored. Windows 10 requires SSE2, PAE, and NX for 32-bit or AMD64 with specific support.
Microsoft clearly didn't anticipate Apple switching away from version 10, which necesitates Microsoft switching from version 10 to combat the version number gap. There'a still potential for Microsoft to backpedal on TPM, or deploy something that justifies it. Alternatively, if Windows 10 is the last Windows I'll need, I guess I'll move to FreeBSD.
Visit the "Friendly Windows Thread" on /g.
Nope. >:(