No but "because 27 pages of boring and annoying backstory which are logically consistent but result in an outcome you don't like for seemingly arbitrary reasons" is potentially a good justification even if it sucks and is boring and tl;dr.

You wouldn't argue that a mathematical proof is more than 2 pages long and therefore doesn't count, right?

Do you generally assume anything potentially complicated, or anything that hasn't been specifically explained to you, is automatically specious?

not what I said, but I will rephrase for you.

the law is inherently always complicated, because it, by definition, must provide general and categorical solutions to a wide range of particular instances.