Seven great but notoriously hard-to-finish books
bigthink.com
bigthink.com
For me Gödel, Escher, Bach is a better example of a great book I kept bouncing off of for various reasons even though I read it much later in life. Gravity's Rainbow in fiction.
Some of my favorite books are ones that I started three or four times before pushing through and loving them by the end.
I find that strange because I liked _Catch-22_ and found it easy to read! (And easier than _Genji_, _Solitude_, or _Brief History_.)
Edit: (maybe both of them suffer from the 1940's context?)
Then one time I picked it up and something was different. I read it cover to cover over a few days and loved it.
To anyone who gave up American Gods: you're right, they're wrong.
But then again, I really loved the philosophical ramblings on history and leadership and how much Napoleon sucked. Honestly feel it should be required reading for anyone in a leadership position. But then again, if you just want to read the story, the parts can be easily skipped.
Granted you need to have some baseline knowledge of Russian culture and with some philosophical concepts like materialism to really grok it, I guess. I think hard to read can be very subjective anyway depending heavily on what books one have read before and general background.
In retrospect, I should have read a Cliffs Notes version before attempting the novel. I'd recommend anyone interested in reading Ulysses to go in knowing the story and what the chapters are about ahead of time. It's not going to spoil anything.
Finnegan's Wake, I gave up after 20 pages. That thing makes Ulysses seem like a YA novel by comparison.
I read it 25 years ago, and at one point, I realized that I did not have to continue reading it.
I will try, though.
OTOH, of course, some books do expect you to toil through, generally due to their scope or aspiration or both. In fiction, Ulysses mentioned here, and In Search of Lost Time would be examples that are very different but people have found challenging. For nonfiction, The Road to Reality and Gödel, Escher, Bach would be some examples.
Plenty of books on that list give you fair warning before embarking, but LotR lures you in with "You liked The Hobbit, right? Fancy some more of that?"
I can’t find an updated version of the list
I couldn't put 100 Years of Solitude down once I picked it up, and I don't understand why it's on the list as opposed to Gravity's Rainbow or something along those lines.
0) The autumn of the patriarch, by Marquez
1) Gormenghast series, by Mervyn Peake
2) The third period of Henry James (The Wings of the Dove, The Ambassadors, and The Golden Bowl).
3) The Death of Virgil, by Hermann Broch
I do suggest trying Gormenghast, it's an amazingly written fantasy series.
I've never gotten around to reading "A Brief History of Time", but I still hold out delusions that I'll get through "The Road to Reality" by Roger Penrose some day.
This being said, it provides a wonderful perspective on how the stories that define us come from a magical yet misty history.
And hey, maybe the prose is like Faulkner or McCarthy in the native language and you can gallop your way through those sections, I dunno.
I still put it in my top 10!
- Gravity's Rainbow (which I did enjoy, but so many people raged against)
- Infinite Jest
- Finnegan's Wake
- War and Peace
- Divine Comedy
- Remembrance of Things Past
Didn't feel the same way about Catch-22. Really solid humor mixed with absolute tragedy.
Am I strange?
People here are likely 2-5 standard deviations above the 100 IQ average.
If you want to interact or witness "average" people, go to a Walmart or a local supermarket. And then listen to people talk.
What are your thoughts on Rick and Morty?
And it's not 'exclusive'. It's not like getting an account here is hard. But staying requires understanding of the topics discussed at length. So it's a self-selecting exclusivity at best.
Rick and Morty? That's the terrible flash animation that ended up getting a full animation? It was puerile when it started. I assume it's no better. (I have better things to do with my time.)
And yes, by the way, i DO have a Rick & Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel, kid.
https://old.reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/6qp86b/to_be_fai...
The never-ending footnotes did amuse me though.
"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
"His white knit shirt and name-brand shorts were soaked through so you could see the straps of his jock biting into the soft ass I was handing him."
"Jim, [Marlon Brando] moved like a careless fingerling, one big muscle, muscularly naïve, but always, notice, a fingerling at the center of a clear current. That kind of animal grace. The bastard wasted no motion, is what made it art, this brutish no-care."
"The key to the successful administration of a top-level junior tennis academy lies in cultivating a kind of reverse-Buddhism, a state of Total Worry."
"Yes, I'm paranoid -- but am I paranoid enough?"
‘Hey Hallie? I think I’m being followed.’ ‘Some men are born to lead, O.’
Reminds me of this onion article: https://www.theonion.com/girlfriend-stops-reading-david-fost...
I feel like content-mill stuff has been making it to HN’s front page more in the last year or so than before. Perhaps the system for moving things from New to the front page needs to be tweaked?