Hacker News Reader

Comment by progman32 | Hacker News Reader

I'm not sure what you mean by "conventional", certainly a plain resistive heater drawing 500W emits the same amount of energy as a computer drawing 500W. If you stretch the definition of efficiency, an infrared heater produces a similar subjective improvement to a room's temperature for less energy, as the infrared light skips heating the surrounding air and warms the subject directly. That is one downside to using computers as heaters - they produce almost no infrared, which can be less efficient for a given subjective experience.

View on HN

Ah, but you shouldn't be using a plain resistive heater in most circumstances. Heat pumps are much more efficient.

I use a resistive heater. A heat pump would be about 1000 times noisier, and I live in an apartment, so I couldn't put the heat pump where I don't have to hear it.

No longer true since at least 5+ years. New heat pumps are very _very_ silent

Hate to be rude, but I doubt that anything with a compressor can be silent. All heat pumps have compressors, right?

I've been around dozens of air conditioners, every one quite noisy compared to a resistive heater. Are heat pumps quieter than air conditioners?

I have both a heat pump and resistive heating in my house. The compressor goes outside the house so you never hear it (and it's not particularly loud, just sounds like a quiet powerful fan). The indoor split units, as they're called, just blow air over the coils. The fans are very quiet, quieter than a typical standing fan or an A/C vent blowing air.

Resistive heating is usually much quieter, however it can make annoying ticking sounds as the metal expands against the wall, or an annoying electrical buzz as the power is cycled on and off, multiple times a minute. This happens even if they're installed perfectly, houses and walls move over time.

Just remember that an A/C is also a heat pump. Lots of apartments around the world with A/C.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com