Is this not common practice? I would be uncomfortable taking an ambiguously labeled “cold medicine” pill, personally. I know which medicines are effective for me and which are a waste of time and money.
Is this not common practice? I would be uncomfortable taking an ambiguously labeled “cold medicine” pill, personally. I know which medicines are effective for me and which are a waste of time and money.
They buy a brand that promises to fix what they don’t like, and if it works, they buy more next time.
https://www.cvs.com/search?searchTerm=acetomeniphen https://www.cvs.com/search?searchTerm=ibuprofin
But there's also one bottle of pills labeled as Arthritis Pain Relief. And one labeled as Muscle Pain relief. Which both have exactly the same medicine and the same time release capsules.
There's a Migraine variant label, a Tension Headache variant label. Just "Headache" relief. There's Back and Body pain relief (though that one is Apsirin, it's just showing up in the acetomeniphen search).
Some years back, Reckitt (British-Dutch multinational) got in trouble with the ACCC (Australia's competition and consumer protection regulator) for doing this. Selling "Headache Pain", "Back Pain", "Period Pain", etc all next to each other, despite all having identical active ingredients. The ACCC took them to court for misleading consumers, and won.
https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/full-federal-court-ord...
"We can charge twice as much if we put it in a pink packet and say it's for period pain".
Very deceptive.