Why the simplest explanation isn't always the best – PNAS
pnas.org
pnas.org
> In philosophy, Occam's razor [Latin: novacula Occami] is the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements. It is also known as the principle of parsimony or the law of parsimony [Latin: lex parsimoniae].
Balance puzzle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_puzzle :
> A balance puzzle or weighing puzzle is a logic puzzle about balancing items—often coins—to determine which holds a different value, by using balance scales a limited number of times. These differ from puzzles that assign weights to items, in that only the relative mass of these items is relevant.
Logical connective: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_connective
Quantum logic > Quantum logic as the logic of observables > The logic of classical mechanics && The propositional lattice of a quantum mechanical system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_logic#Quantum_logic_as...
Quantum discord: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_discord :
> In quantum information theory, quantum discord is a measure of nonclassical correlations between two subsystems of a quantum system. It includes correlations that are due to quantum physical effects but do not necessarily involve quantum entanglement.
Quantum nonlocality: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_nonlocality ; the dog on the Moon ate my homework 10 monotonic light years ago instantaneously due to nonlocality
And then Quantum Causal Inference (and Quantum Statistical Mechanics) as a or the sufficient means with which to prove truth, epistemologically
And then emergent dynamics in quasiparticle fluid phenomena unpredicted by curl further increase the degree of the nonlocal, entangled, superfluid, nonlinear complex adaptive system; and again the simplest explanation was wrong; it was the butterfly flapping its wings that caused the nonlocal dog to eat the homework about the supercooled and so superfluidic helium in space
May be sufficient to describe all of the actual relations
Cirq docs > Named Topologies > LineTopology, TiltedSquareLattice https://quantumai.google/cirq/named_topologies
QISkit Lattice models > LineLattice, SquareLattice, HyperCubicLattice, TriangularLattice: https://qiskit.org/ecosystem/nature/tutorials/10_lattice_mod...
But how do we do CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) with QC with quantum logical decomposition with comparatively tiny lattices with current mortal quantum computers? Given that the known degrees of complexity in fluid problems with rotation and expansion - like Godel logic's Fluid solutions to GR - exceed the available topologies and counts EC error corrected qubits?
How complex could the relations between arbitrary things be, given terminology of Quantum discord; nonlocal entanglement and non-entanglement relations and Occam's Razor and fluids without emergence?