1 million active physicians in the US. At $352k/ year that is only $352 billion in physician compensation, or less than 10% of total healthcare spending.
> That’s a big chunk of the difference.
The math disagrees with you.
> That’s a big chunk of the difference.
The math disagrees with you.
Are you confused as to the meaning of 'big chunk'?
It by no means implies a majority or even close to a majority.
If you are confused about my previous comment, I added the 40% to 50% example to demonstrate the likely overall contribution of salaries to costs.
This appears to be a random pseudonym account so it's unproductive to phrase it in this way, because it requires a lot more credibility to back it up.
A simple counterexample: I clearly think 10% is fine, and I've met at least a few dozen people who share a similar view. Which suggests it's a common enough sentiment among HN readers.
I've met at least a few dozen people who share a similar view. Which suggests it's a common enough sentiment among HN readers.
Like who?
It appears to reinforce my point, in that it never defines 'large chunk' to have any specific range of values. Certainly not anywhere near a majority.
> Like who?
Some of the human individuals I've met and talked with throughout life.
This seems like ignoring the question, so the opinion is noted, but it doesn't sound convincing.
I still stand by my belief.
Is there some rationale behind the seemingly incredible agitation, and bizarre attempts at deflecting direct questions?
Otherwise this just seems like a self-parody.
If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.