I feel like this is another situation where sense of time can be reversed.
Derives from consciousness being actually a slow integration of diverse parallel processes.
I feel like this is another situation where sense of time can be reversed.
Derives from consciousness being actually a slow integration of diverse parallel processes.
I've had a semi-similar feeling, where it seems like I've made a decision simultaneously in past/present/future. So it's somehow the way it has always been, even though I decided it now.
There is no basis for my theory and it's fantastical horseshit.
Plus our brains are pretty good at predicting what will happen based on things we've seen before and most people have intrusive thoughts (though these are usually based on actions rather than just things happening, e.g. throwing a baby out of a window or jumping in front of an oncoming train). Our memories are also extremely malleable so if a prediction didn't match exactly our brains will happily adjust the details to find a match or we'll ignore details that don't match because they don't seem as important as the ones that do.
It's spooky but the real wonder here is that our brains work somewhat reliably most of the time to begin with. Even our vision is a complete mess - ranging from the physical blind spots in our eyes to various forms of "blindness" (e.g. change blindness) and the work our brains have to do in order to compensate for saccades (i.e. why you don't see motion blur every time your eyes move).
I've experienced that exact same feeling you're describing a handful of times. Never quite could pinpoint the phenomena ever before; so I resorted to asking ChatGPT, and it gave me this: https://chat.openai.com/share/a3b2aff6-3973-466b-b2b3-a3612c...
Déjà vécu. A movie analogy: https://chat.openai.com/share/7ac902c8-39c2-49a0-a883-90d5e5...
"Zeman says he has seen several people whose experiences fit the description of déjà vécu more than déjà vu, because they are so overpowering. Like Shona, a woman in her mid-twenties who woke up one morning, ate breakfast, got ready for work, but felt she was 'acting in a film that she had seen before.'", from https://www.vice.com/en/article/gymn5m/there-is-more-than-on...
I tripped in the same place twice exactly a year apart (four trips, two places). On the second of these I had a sense that time looped around so I could hang a left and go re-live the past year, or I could take a right and move on to the future.
Not sure how many lefts I made, but the most recent pair of choices were: right, right (as they'd have to be in order for me to be in this now).
I'm certain it's strongly connected to dopamine and serotonin (of fucking course) circuits and global receptor states and depending on intensity of the sensation and level of awareness of person probably linked to schizophrenia, paranoia and other fun stuff.
I can't remember the name of the study but I believe it was posted here on HN a short while ago. If anyone is in the mood or has it stored in memory or bookmarks, please provide. Thanks!
But I like how the parent called it "a slow integration of diverse parallel processes" - not labeling the experience as some kind of problem.
Maybe on psychedelics?
Yes. I might rephrase to highlight possibility that consciousness is a form of recursive self-control of the relative timebases of those many parallel, and only roughly synchronized neural processes.
Modulating relative synchrony (parasynchrony) may be as important in cognition and consciousness as the number of spikes per time window.
One of the big challenges in consciousness research is the binding problem across systems.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_problem
Binding may be explainable by multiplexing and manipulating a set of quantal temporal offset strata spaced a few milliseconds apart from each other. Binding, attention, and even consciousness may involve a set of recursive attentional proceses that shift and shunt active neuronal subcircuits into different temporal offset tiers. A few milliseconds one way or another may be the difference between attending or ignoring a stimulus or proto-thought.
An inexact metaphor: imagine a set of adjacent radio channels swapping content to be closer or farther apart in frequency. Neighboring channels snap together if content harmonizes, giving rise to vibrant voice and music. If not, then only low level signal or noise.
The recursive modulation of thalamocorticothalamic activity across “chosen” subsets of circuits may be what Douglas Hofstadter was hinting at towards the end of Gödel, Escher, Bach (p 709; Strange Loops as the Crux of Consciousness). What I am adding is the probable CNS circuitry and the idea of temporal multiplexing—-a common theme in both analog and digital processor design and computing.