Hacker News Reader

I dunno, it seems like the judgement is sound to me. I’d place that error on the offending party, not the enforcing body. Company clearly wasn’t paying attention to the books nor the harm their use of technology was causing, and thus got their just rewards for that behavior. “Talking about screwing up twice” seems like a more accurate statement.

Not only does being poor not exempt you from the law, it's usually who the laws apply most to.

You don’t get a get out of jail free card because you have financial problems.

I can't believe they would arrest me for being a peeping tom, don't they know I have a lot of credit card debt?