See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect - the term "AI" used to include things like chess engines (and even simpler search algorithms), but once computers are able to do those things for a while and people get used to it, the term "AI" tends to shift and only refer to things that machines can't do yet.
It's admittedly a bit of an unsatisfying answer, but whether AI is here is more a question of your definition of "intelligence" than anything else.
Obviously an AI that can have a human like text conversation has broader use than the Go playing AI.
I find it curious that in sci-fi the idea of being human-like was considered the hardest task for an AI, and the walking encyclopedia which is never wrong bit was the easy part.
Seems we did the hard part first with LLMs...
They’re like a 1,000% boost if your job is spamming, advertising for scams, managing astroturf campaigns, or spreading misinformation. So. Hooray.
So for most jobs that aren’t net-negative for society, no, not really, if “there” is “useful enough to seriously shake things up”.