MakerBot + Pinterest = $250 Million in Sales
wired.com
wired.com
http://www.scrapbookupdate.com/2010/04/07/provo-craft-sues-m... http://www.scrapbookupdate.com/2011/03/11/provo-craft-sues-s...
MakerBot, on the other hand, publishes the plans for their hardware so anyone can build it, and maintains thingiverse.com so anyone can design anything they want to print.
I understand why the editor wants to draw a connection, but there are some significant differences in the two businesses' philosophies.
I've noticed this trend among non-programmers of using "open source" incorrectly to describe anything that's not completely locked down.
I've built a RepRap.
My wife has no interest in it. The output isn't artistic enough. It's not that great.
Now, if someone could bring a computer-guided milling machine for $400, backed by a range of expensive woods / plastic consumables...
The software is a disaster, there are a few dozen builds of the libraries required to operate it, and only certain combinations work.
I've tried around 20 combinations so far and not one prints correctly in automatic mode.
When I have the time (and desire) it's something that I'll solve (I'm a software engineer after all, the community is mainly tech/mech engineers).
Dear reporter - My company is just like x in y way. Care to write a story about us?
Cricut users express their creativity by cutting out content that was already flowing through the system and expressing their creativity in arranging the cut-outs, much the same way people create Boards on Pinterest.
Less so: They figured that any products which primarily target women must be fundamentally similar.