> So this may not be a big deal
You're right, but Red Hat led Debian/Ubuntu over the systemd cliff.
(Because, you know, a gigantic ball of binary code is better than runit/s6/sysv/etc. /s)
You're right, but Red Hat led Debian/Ubuntu over the systemd cliff.
(Because, you know, a gigantic ball of binary code is better than runit/s6/sysv/etc. /s)
I'm happy the gigantic ball of ill-maintained shell scripts from the last century is gone from my systems.
Sv, smf, s6, openrc, runit, dinit, epoch, BSD, ...
Alpine & Gentoo are on OpenRC, Void is on runit, the BSDs have always had their own init, everything else I can think of is either on systemd, or hardly significant.
I mean, sysvinit was horrible, and systemd is horrible in very different ways, just wondering who and why is holding on.
If this is your idea of an argument as to why this move is bad, then you have no leg to stand on.