How to clean chemistry glassware
chem.rochester.edu
chem.rochester.edu
Base bath is how you clean glassware.
The base bath was a _saturated_ solution of KOH (potassium hydroxide) in a 10-gallon PTFE (molded "teflon"). You knew it was saturated by the KOH precipitate at the bottom.
You take your "dirties", making absolutely sure they had no residual acid on them, and ever so slowly, ease them into the bath. 24 or 36 hours later, remove them and repeat with the next batch.
After a few dozen cycles, you have to change out the base for fresh stuff. For that, you needed a face shield, shoulder gloves, and extremely steady hands.
Tedious, dangerous work.
Wore butyl gloves and apron and a face shield. Accidentally raised my hands above horizontal once and didn't notice a trickle of acid over the edge of the gloves. Next time that shirt came out of the wash the sleeves were shredded.
Our aqua regia bath was also about 10 gallons, but it was in a WW2-era fume hood and it looked like it was made of some kind of metal in a concrete shield, that had been partially eaten away. One time a cockroach the length of my thumb fell into the bath while I was working - I heard the splash, and by the time I turned my head to see what happened, it was mostly just exoskeleton. I quit that job pretty soon after that.
It was used by alchemists, as it can dissolve gold.
After daily use for 4 years it felt very routine. Glad I don’t do it anymore though.
I used to love how shiny the glassware was after coming out of the base bath. Lovely!
Anywho, the old base had to be (gently) neutralized with acid before being dumped into the aqueous waste barrel. This had to be done slowly because exothermicity and dissolution heat.
Iirc, the waste barrels were taken back by Sigma Aldrich, to be batched, filtered, and re-distilled into reagent-grade solvents. Circle of life.
There is an entire industry around optimally managing chem lab waste. It doesn’t go to the landfill unless it has been thoroughly processed for both value and toxicity. Industrial chemistry is a low-margin business, companies extract every bit of value from their waste stream that they can.
i'm also sort of surprised this treatment doesn't corrode the glass. i guess borosilicate holds up to things that would ruin soda-lime glass
i don't think you'd have any heat of dissolution involved with a siphon
never done this tho, sounds scary
I've run into "Yes HF works here but SERIOUSLY DON'T" in so many different contexts and processes. Sounds like a lovely thing to keep a nice distance from!
https://www.science.org/topic/blog-category/things-i-wont-wo...
He was sitting at a hood and knocked the container over into his lap. About a liter.
He was rinsed off but eventually the pain become so bad he jumped into the university swimming pool and stayed there until EMS arrived.
They ended up amputating both legs. He died anyways.
Bad stuff. I never worked with the concentrated stuff.
https://www.uvm.edu/cosmolab/safety_manuals/Fatality%20due%2...
It’s the reason for many a superfund site.
I guess one day this will be indeed standard, but as of today, (useful) robots that could do it, are way more expensive than humans ..
Hydrofluoric: Concentrated solutions of HF will remove just about everything from glass and will even etch the surface of the glass itself. It should not be used on calibrated volumetrics. HF causes severe, painful burns that do not heal well, and prolonged or intense exposure can lead to a very slow, painful death. It is not to be used by any students at Truman under any circumstances.
It’s also used as a wafer cleaner in semiconductor fabs.
If none of those three will touch it, it's probably not cleanable by anything short of piranha-class terrors. If they can touch it but don't get you all the way there, there's probably some combination of detergents and procedures that will do it, but it may take some serious effort to figure that combination out.
I assume you’re not joking, but this was a major whoosh if you were!
Baking soda and peroxide cleans that shit off like magic. You should Google the exact procedure and proportions.
Edited to add: a single edge razor scraper is worth a try on stainless. The razor blade is roughly as hard as the substrate, so you won't gouge it too bad. Get the plastic Allway holders. The metal ones are garbage and, incredibly, the generic plastic ones are pretty inferior.
Very :-). I'm talking about a pan accidentally left on the grill or in the oven for too long until it smokes. The residue is pretty much what you end up with when seasoning cast iron cookware, and is very hard and resistant to usual household chemicals. It's far from the oily residue that is removed easily with paint thinner or acetone.
[1] https://www.globalsanitation.com/edit/files/sds/retail/easy_...
Car battery charger clamped with an electrode to sacrificial metal plate and an electrode to cookware; both hanging apart from each other in a bath of electrolyte made of water + sodium carbonate. Let it work for a day or so in a well ventilated area (it will create hydrogen gas).
I might have a low risk tolerance, but I would toss any cookware touched by, like, half of the chemicals you listed. Don’t want to find out the hard way that some nasty layer of something is slowly leaching into my food.
If you do move forwards with this, definitely write up your findings... "Removing burnt food with piranha solution without dying" will make a great blog post.
If you know what you're doing the equation boils down to determining if the container's worth more than the piranha solution will cost you to make in time/money spent. https://drs.illinois.edu/Page/SafetyLibrary/PiranhaSolutions
https://www.alconox.com/product/alconox/
https://www.alconox.com/product/alcojet/
Their sheet says "biodegradable" so was curious about enviro impacts from your vantage
Our industrial chemicals are highly toxic and kill whatever exists near the runoff: "this has to be carefully regulated."
Our industrial chemicals are highly nutritious and cause spontaneous blooms of life near the runoff: "this has to be banned."
Also, magic acid feels left out of this exclusive Christmas party: https://youtu.be/pWB7oGbd8Yo
However I will note this guide specifically points out to use butyl gloves twice.
Much like most people won't simply know how dangerous it is to mix Nitrile gloves and Nitric Acid. When things can melt your skin, it's always good form to verify safety info at the time rather than just taking somebody's word for it, no?
My 2 cents that is probably obvious anyhow
https://research.usu.edu/ehs/files/ansell-8th-chemical-resis...
Good to know that's not always the case?
Good luck finding something that protects your hand from the fairly occasional DCM/DMF/name any org solvent drops/spatters/spills
Seriously, what's safe and effective?
If you're really serious about your cleanliness, a desktop ultrasonic cleaner is also amazing for cleaning bowls and downstems. You can get them for a few dozen dollars from Amazon and the like.
I make it by macerating orange peels in 95% ethanol.
But I'm sure glad I don't have to go near any of this stuff!
Hard to believe there's any hobby chemists out there messing with mercury and stuff, handling most of these chemicals seems like something you'd only ever do for a huge salary or if you believed your work was going to save many lives.
It doesn't seem to be 100% computerized yet, people still talk about doing real experiments where they expect to find something new about what they're studying, as opposed to just finding their own mistakes or reading about other people's discoveries.
I'd imagine that's probably part of the appeal for some people, in tech so many of us almost never discover anything new that would be of interest outside that one specific project, except an occasional framework bug.
The glasswares, along with the spent disposables, gloves etc were dumped into bleach solution. Even after a full month soaked in bleach and whatnot, I could still smell the nasty odor from the beakers and flasks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiol
The 1970s Muppet Show US television program had a recurring segment on “Muppet Labs” with a hapless lab assistant named Beaker given silly and dangerous things to do by his boss. These cleaning processes sound like a Beaker bit. But the Muppet Show was a comedy…
Glass is amazing for chemistry not only because it is chemically inert, transparent, has a high melting temperature, and is reasonably strong but also because it is easy to clean!
Because these things can cost hundreds of dollars apiece [1]. They're handmade, and many universities run their own glassblowing shops [1] so that researchers can have the instruments they need precisely tuned to whatever is required. Training to be a glassblower that can produce the required quality takes almost a decade [3], if you want more pictures on just how insanely complex a single piece can get look here [4].
[1] https://hooloodistill.com/products/borosilicate-glass-distil...
[2] https://www.uibk.ac.at/en/aatc/service/scientific-glassblowi...
[3] https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the-underrated-art-of-sc...
[4] https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/inside-scientific-glassblow...
Also, lab glass is more expensive than it looks. If you care about this level of cleanliness, then you likely also care about the precision of your glassware. And lab glassware comes in much more exotic and hard to make forms than beakers. You also might not be able to throw it away in the normal trash because it is contaminated with something hazardous.
For anyone wanting to play the home game thinking they can just have their supplies same day from Amazon, just don't
A lot of lab glassware involves complex joins. Condensers and refluxers have tubes in tubes with edges that are not even accessible.
There may be reasonable arguments to use some of the cheaper glassware once. I know I have chucked glassware instead of cleaning it. Specially if I used it for something I never want near anything else.
Some of the more exotic items are custom-designed and hand-made, and are exceedingly rare. Backlogs exist. "Please, don't retire, keep making us glassware" problems exist in chemistry departments. Various articles surface about this particular problem every so often.
And, frankly, if people are taking this much time to clean the glass, it should be obvious to you that one of your priors is wrong.
Rather than running it in a 10mL round bottom, just use a 25 mL vial. You can fit a rubber septum and purge it. Magnetic stir bars are small enough to fit. You can add reagents using a syringe.
Then just rinse and toss after.
Quality glassware isn’t cheap because the ground glass joint has to be precisely ground to not leak. But if you don’t need a condenser or drop funnel, disposable vials work just fine.
That's another cleaning strategy.
Notably, his concern was not that the glass was dirty, but that it was literally breaking. As in, spontaneously spill a beaker full of acid on the table breaking.
The experiment he blames this on was using the beakers to contain hot plasma. The beakers came out looking fine, but probably suffered substantial thermal stress.
I really like the all-glass filter holders with the 24-40 ground glass bases instead of the gooch seals. The smelly rubber gooch seals seem to go to shit so quickly.
Whilst rightfully it's not fashionable nowadays, I can attest however that chromic acid cleans glassware remarkably well (once it was just about the only cleaner we used).
Would you eat/drink out of glassware that had been made “quantitatively clean”?
edit: should've known it would already be a thing :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utBxdlN7YFI&t=9s
One of my favourite words that I never expected to encounter in the wild!
"something that makes you cry".