Paying for a product instead of being the product.
Huge quality of life improvement. How is it different from paying for Netflix and similar?
If it were ads for car insurance and lego, I don't think there would be the same concern.
You're still the product. You think they aren't still collecting info on what you watch and associating that with your google account for cross-marketing elsewhere on the web?
-Every corporation in the world.
I do really enjoy my ad free YouTube, 8 years and counting, the $20 / month for 5 accounts is very much worth it
I also run pi-hole at home, because while I understand the need for ads, I'm done with 23 ads, 15 flyouts, 1 video that will play in the corner until the end of time even though you obviously scrolled past it with zero intention of viewing it, 4 animated gifs, a pop-up chatbot window, etc. etc. etc.
You'll find the same quality spectrum. At least I know that the creator is seeing more of the ad dollars.
1. sponsored ads are only in a minority of videos, so largely the platform is actually ad-free. I'm paying to not have YT ads, I did not expect my subscription to eliminate sponsored ads. Where is the lie?
2. paid YT is categorically a better experience and worth every penny, even with the occasional sponsored ad, which again, can be skipped
3. YMMV, it really depends on the content you chose to consume. I stay away from the most viewed creators, it's typically low quality
4. Direct payments for a product is a much healthier model than the ad supported model, imho.
On youtube the content was uploaded by creators on the understanding it would be freely accessible to everyone.
Additionally it's a matter of user control and rights. They don't get to tell the user what their user agent does and what content it should fetch or display to the user or what code it should run.
It's their website, but it's my device.
The next step is for youtube to require you to watch the ad and stop playing if you look away.
A lot of YouTube creators make their content for money. YouTube in this case is the layer between creator and watcher, making sure they get paid. Wether that is by ad money or subscription money. Before that, things were much more difficult for video creators.
> The next step is for youtube to require you to watch the ad and stop playing if you look away.
The next step for YouTube is hopefully to put the entire site behind a login and remove all ads.
But, this kind of stuff is a big reason they want remote attestation so badly.
Except the timeshare pitch is hyper-personalized specifically for you based on your entire internet history everywhere and is designed to yield the maximum chance of manipulating you into falling for it.
As a consumer you have easy options to block out the sales pitch, except the store who has a monopoly on the thing you want is now trying to scare users into disabling their ad blockers. The users that do this are disproportionately more likely to be less versed in how these things work and are thus more likely to fall for the scam.
Yes, it's a protection racket. It's just got a funny hat on this time.