Now right-wing, anti-'woke' doublethink has come for George Orwell (Opinion)
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Please don't forget the OP is an opinion piece, and do your best to keep discussion civil.
---
EDIT: If the discussion degrades into low quality, please flag the OP.
> Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
If you want to see dead comments, you don't need to repost them, you can just turn on the showdead option in your account preferences.
Because we're in an environment in which authors can be and sometimes are "canceled" for reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of their work.
For me, it was refreshing to come across a piece that expresses admiration for Orwell's work, and also recognizes he was a flawed person when judged by modern standards. The two thoughts are not incompatible with each other.
Also, this passage struck a chord with me:
> However bad Orwell’s attitudes toward women were, the warning he gave us in “1984” was not that society might someday become so twisted that women would criticize him. His novel was a warning against the kind of leaders who call their opponents “vermin,” leaders who want to punish people for having the “wrong” opinions or being of the “wrong” ethnicity. It was written about leaders who become cult figures, whose idealized image is plastered everywhere as a symbol of belonging, who hold rallies at which their followers join to scream in ecstatic hatred. It was written about a world in which such leaders could avail themselves of advanced technology, in which propaganda and surveillance were unavoidable and ubiquitous."
I couldn't agree more.
Cancelling George Orwell is just a humorous image.
What is this weak drivel doing on the front page?
[1] ...who in real life come from nearly all ideological standpoints, from "traditional" Marxists through classical liberals through centrists via conservatives to whatever lies opposite Marxists nowadays.
Perhaps more interestingly, the list was probably comissioned by Robert Conquest who went on to author multiple books that have become cannon for anticommunists despite being thoroughly debunked. Interesting how these posh boys always end up doing this, I wonder what their vested interests are.
Ironically, the author himself does not seem to see him self as part of the problem.
I would rather him write about class, elites, grassroots or whatever.