How to Build a Bike Lane in America
theverge.com
theverge.com
My concern here is those building bike lanes are building it for a near future where cars are banned so my initial points are invalid to them.
I'm not sure if you are referring to some sort of conspiracy theory (e.g. the current conspiracy theory about 15 minute cities) or something else, but this doesn't really make sense. If cars were banned there wouldn't be any need for "bike lanes" so why would people bother building bike lanes in anticipation for a future where cars are banned?
Of course the roads would still be there but everyone driving on it would be a worker of some kind (trucks, usps, ups, ambulance, busses etc).
In that case, having a bike lane on the road is fine. They already did it with busses. Entire lanes here are painted red with bus only on them. They'll just do the same for bikes. One green lane for bikes, 1 red lane for city vehicles (busses, cops, ambulances), 1 normal lane for annointed drivers (delivery trucks etc).
> conspiracy theory
It's already happening. Manhattan just added a $15 dollar toll , entire lanes are being devoted to busses, neighborhood streets are being closed to through traffic. Give it 997 more cuts to get to what i'm talking about.
Even if you make all these vehicles driverless and electric, cyclists aren't going to want to regularly ride inches away from them, just like they don't want to ride inches away from a speeding train even though the train can't easily leave its tracks. Cyclists make mistakes too, and making a small steering error, or hitting a bump in the road, could have catastrophic results in the environment you seem to be promoting. Cyclists need their own road, and until that happens, riding on the sidewalk is the proper place for them.
edit: turns out that source was old. they have 1500 miles of bike lanes, but my point still stands.
As an Australian it seems obviously ridiculous to remove all cars, given that huge areas of the country are necessarily unreachable by anything else, but it would actually be pretty feasible to remove privately owned passenger vehicles from the inner suburbs[0] and make public transport free. I'm not even sure it's a bad idea.
[0] This is a dialect-specific phrase and "suburb" in Australian English means roughly what "neighbourhood" means in American English, but I'm not sure what the American word for "somewhat dense ring around the very dense centre of a city" would be