Hacker News Reader

Comment by dogcomplex | Hacker News Reader

Which is why we need Proof of Identity based internet infrastructure asap to verify people are real behind the avatar.

Won't stop the problem. There is an inexhaustible supply of real people who are willing to help game any system for ideology or entertainment.

It's trivial to store a ban list of several billion User IDs in memory. That's only a few tens of GB.

As long as it can be guaranteed that one specific individual can only ever create one account, it's not a problem at all.

In many countries there is already a market for buying and selling real world identities of penniless students and homeless alcoholics to use for nefarious ends, e.g. financial fraud or registering shell companies. Given enough financial incentive, Proof of Identity is insufficient.

Proof of identity with a social network backing of people vouching for each other then. As long as ids are limited we can track and assign trust in a secondary market. Anyone pulling stunts like you mention is just selling out their credit for a one-time small gain. Of course that will happen still, but it can be disincentivized financially - and has been in irl societies less desperate or with more attached to their social credit

> Proof of identity with a social network backing of people vouching for each other then

Which would seriously reduce the number of people willing or able to use the web.

You can wrap those identities behind anonymous usernames. The point is just to be able to link 1 identity per person.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com