> The board’s mandate is to “humanity,” not investors.
Somebody put her there, told her "you know, say it's for humanity or something" and she actually believed it.
No, it's for people to get rich.
Somebody put her there, told her "you know, say it's for humanity or something" and she actually believed it.
No, it's for people to get rich.
But you seem to have something in mind. Tell me.
So there are many particulars that mean pattern matching to a standard board dispute will lose something. I think it's likely many of the primary actors have, at various times, had non-strictly-pecuniary motives. That one side won doesn't mean that the other side was always a farce.