But this implies that people at facebook believe so much in their AI that there is no way at all to appeal what it does to a human eventually. Not even for doing learning reinforcement they have human people to review eventually some post that a person keep saying the AI is flagging incorrectly.
Either they trust too much in the AI or they are incompetent.
No, it means that management has decided that the cost of assuring human review isn't worth the benefit. That doesn't mean they trust the AI particularly, it could just mean that they don’t see avoid false positives on detecting unwanted content as worth much cost to avoid.
Not caring at all about false positives, which by the way are very common, enters the category of incompetence for me.
Misalignment of Meta's interests with yours, not incompetence.