>the sounds for man, and the word man can be mapped. The concept of man can be mapped from English to Chinese. Given enough of these clues, and a large enough data set it's not shocking that models get decent at inference between languages.
1. Many such concepts cannot be directly mapped between different languages especially with distant language pairs.
2. Language Models and Image models even if both are only trained on their respective modality learn structural representations so similar, you can connect them with a simple linear layer. That's it. Entirely different modalities
https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.15162
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08485
I think you are severely underestimating the extent to which representations can group in neural networks.
They're mammals, they're social animals, they see. You're assuming a level of alienness we don't have the knowledge or understanding to truly ascertain.