The three lines above the last don't do anything to say why you'd want to use the price of gold for that yardstick. And once again with it being so detached from the actual reality of most consumers it seems to be a pretty poor one. In fact, the ending of "irrespective of the relative fluctuations of gold vs food vs energy" kind of alludes to its value being radically detached from things people
actually care about. If the fluctuations of USD / Gold are so detached from things people actually care about, it seems like it is a worthless yardstick.
And here's the real question. If the price of gas and the price of food stays the same but gold goes to $9,000/oz, did my life change? No, not really. If the other prices stay the same but gold goes to $20/oz, did my life change? No. If gas goes to $50/gal, did my life change? Radically. If (index of food) goes 10x higher, did my life change? Radically. Which is the "real" inflation again?