Don't knock the economic value of majoring in the liberal arts
brookings.edu
brookings.edu
If you graduate college with say a degree in Political Science or Literature and then go out and get a PMP (Project Manager Professional) certification and then find a good paying job after the fact, the reason you found good employment is most likely the result of the certification rather than the underlying degree.
A better comparison would be to compare folks that got a Liberal Arts Degree + a professional certification versus those that just got the professional certification. I would speculate that if you mapped those two data points out they would be very close together.
A comparison like that would call into question the value of that Liberal Arts degree. Even if you were to make more with a degree + cert/experience, what is the threshold that would justify the cost of the degree. If college was still affordable like it was in the 70's, 80's, and 90's then that threshold could still be low enough to justify the cost of the degree but these days with the skyrocketing price of college I'm not sure that it would still pencil out like that.
I wonder what we’re losing as a society by placing all the focus on careers that one can qualify into as cheaply as possible, and which earn the most money.
Arts and crafts don't really pay the bills either. There are of course creators who sell their artwork or crafts on marketplaces like Etsy but that's not really the same thing as a day job where you make 50k a year. I understand where you're going with this but reality is a bitch and people are forced to adapt.
But with the price of higher ed rising exponentially, you now need some sort of economic justification for it, especially considering that you could get roughly the same education online for free.
It’s telling that one of the top complaints about college is that it doesn’t prepare students for the work force. It sounds like something they would say in 50s Soviet society - produce more educated labor to better the state!
As great as STEM is, one thing it does not do is cultivate the mind such that the student can participate in all facets of society competently. Not every problem can or should be viewed exclusively through the lens of science, hence the philosophical predicaments faced by American society today.
I didn't just make up this opinion -- it's a material fact of life in America. As an 18 year old from a working class family, you can make the choice to study for the pleasure of it, but this will almost certainly bring you misery after graduation, as you see that you will never have the means to pay off your massive student debt. You might get lucky and fall into some means of supporting yourself in your field, or you might get slightly less lucky and fall into some means of supporting yourself that is outside your field (I'm a history major making a decent living in IT/Software). Far more likely, you will start your career at some gig that requires any Bachelors degree just because that's an easy way to cut down the pile of resumes. If you're unlucky, you will be competing for the same jobs as recent high school graduates, except you'll be several years older and with a pile more debt than they have.
I'd love my daughter to have a liberal arts education, but not at the expense of being able to provide for herself.
My understanding is that this is exactly the original meaning of the term 'liberal' in liberal arts. Liberal => free => not a servant => has time for leisure. The word 'school' has its origins in the word for leisure. Ideally, liberal arts are the set of skills appropriate for a free person in a democratic system. They should help this person learn to govern themselves, and by extension, each other.
But yes, a liberal arts education is expensive.
Edit: see also "Leisure: The Basis of Culture" by Josef Pieper
That’s not what “useless” stands for here. The way I understand it, it stands for “useless for the purpose of being able to financially support myself and my family [compared to almost all other alternative degree choices]”.
No one is talking about “maximizing profit”, just “having a high likelihood of being able to live comfortably and feed my family”.
Disingenuous nonsense. Price going up 1000% and then down 10% doesn't make it not "skyrocket".
Worthless article.