Hacker News Reader

This looks like a llama2 finetune, so the dataset (inclusive of llama2) isn't fully open as claimed, and I'd still have to accept the Facebook and possibly OpenAI licenses.

Let alone that clearly the base model was built on non-source-code, so their premise doesn't hold.

Disappointing.

View on HN

The number of entities that are possibly constrained by the llama 2 license can be counted on two hands and all of them have the ability to train models that can match Llama 2's performance.

But it's transformative finetune. Why licenses of sources shouldn't apply to original LLVM, but applied to finetune, for which LLVM is just another source?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com