Hacker News Reader

Comment by snowwrestler | Hacker News Reader

The "everything app" can mean an app that does everything, an app that everyone uses, or both.

It's totally possible that X expands its feature set while its audience and cultural relevancy continue to decline. I would not be surprised if it stabilizes at some point as a moderately profitable medium-sized tech company. But it's never again going to be the global phenomenon it was a decade ago.

View on HN

I'm confused. You're comparing Twitter's audience today to 10 years ago and you think it has _declined_? How confident are you on that?

It looks like twitter has about twice the global users as in 2013, but there are like twice the internet users globally than in 2013 and ~5 countries make up half their users.. So it seems pretty accurate to me that they are further from global relevance than in 2013.

That’s not what I wrote.

Old Twitter had that "relevancy" because it was was blessed by the regime. It toed the line and supported the messaging that those in power wanted to be put out. Now it doesn't do that, so it's become even more important, even if seemingly less relevant to those still worshipping inside the church.

Which regime? Keep in mind that Twitter was a huge factor in Donald Trump’s successful presidential campaign.

One reason it mattered so much is that no other platform could do what it did. Now, many can (including Truth Social).

Don't play dumb. I mean the regime, the one with its hands on all the levers.

The one that wants you to pay attention elsewhere.

I still think no other platform can do what Twitter does. None other has the same reach and cultural relevance. Now it's been purged, it's positioned to be a real force for good.

Niche alternatives like Truth are sideshows.

> an app that everyone uses

Wouldn't that be the "everyone app"?

And in any case, I assume Elon would want both.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com