But they'll freeze your account if you post something negative about Elon.
You can disagree with the rule on real time doxxing, or argue that it is irregularly enforced, but your comment seems to be a kind of misinformation where you omit the causal link.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjk5yx/elon-musk-had-his-mos...
> On Wednesday, Twitter chief Elon Musk banned accounts he said he never would in order to protect free speech, made up new rules to justify it, threatened legal action against a 20-year-old, pontificated on how doxing is banned on the platform, and then immediately posted a video doxing a man and asked his 121 million followers to identify him.
> Twitter then retroactively added a new policy that banned accounts "dedicated to sharing someone's live location."
He had previously publicly promised not to ban the account.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456
It is very clear that if Musk wants you off Twitter enough, he's kicking you off Twitter.
If I gave you a list of accounts banned by the previous owners and said "Dorsey banned these guys because he was mad at them!" And then it turned out the accounts were all racists, it might be true that Dorsey didn't like them, but the reason they were banned was the racism and that's true even if Twitter had to post hoc clarify their terms of service.
Analogously, sharing the current location of celebrities, automated in real time, is clearly problematic behavior and related to doxxing which is already against the rules. That's what those accounts were banned for, and again, you are simply lying by trying to conflate the cause.
It's fine that you dislike Musk for whatever reason but you shouldn't lie about him and it is a lie to say that he banned accounts he didn't like and use examples where he banned people for violating the rules.
I directly quoted the news article supporting my claims. You can say black is white, but it's not very believable when people can just scroll up and look.
> My commitment to free speech extends even to not banning the account following my plane, even though that is a direct personal safety risk - @elonmusk
Before you talk about that Elon tried to keep his jet private above and beyond that:
* the jet is registered to a company with a very SpaceX-y name
* the registered office of that company's street address is "1 Space Drive"
* when you search that address, Google reports, "Businesses associated with this address: SpaceX, Tesla, The Boring Company".
How many actually have is anyone's guess.
What's certain is that the rest of the world chose Threads instead as the viable alternative.
Other than Threads, the rest of the so-called Twitter / X alternatives are just as relevant as the skeletons and fossils underground.
Mainly be careful not to say the forbidden words cs and decolnization
Fundamentally, no one should want banking and social media being in the same place. All it takes is one belligerent government to apply pressure.
We already saw Canada freeze bank accounts of people who were protesting in the capitol. I don't need the possibility of my speech locking my account.