The problem with the phrase "artificial general intelligence" is that everyone is arguing about the definition of all three words, and has a different threshold for the boolean pass/fail boundary.

General Intelligence is a gradient, not a hard on/off. Obviously, these are machines so artificial. They're certainly not narrow in scope or abilities so general. They perform tasks we consider intelligent. So...sure. Like ENIAC, i imagine we'll build or have built agi well before everyone can agree it is so.