I'm no expert on costs of these things and especially wouldn't dare to predict how these costs could've behaved in the future, but my guess would be not that the technology had no use, rather that it was too expensive for what it was good at, and the second best was cheap enough to warrant choosing it over Optane.
>Intel Optane persistent memory is blurring the line between DRAM and persistent storage for in-memory computing. Unlike DRAM, Intel Optane persistent memory retains its data if power to the server is lost or the server reboots, but it still provides *near-DRAM performance*. In SAP HANA operation this results in tangible benefits
>Speeds up shutdowns, starts and restarts many times over – significantly reduce system downtime and lower operational costs
Process more data in real-time with increased memory capacity
Lower total cost of ownership by transforming the data storage hierarchy
Improve business continuity with persistent memory and fast data loads at startup
https://sp.ts.fujitsu.com/dmsp/Publications/public/wp-perfor...