>which at it's core has to do with wealth inequality, and overt NIMBY-ism and gentrification
Doesn't SF have the highest concentration of leftists and progresives in the whole US?
Doesn't SF have the highest concentration of leftists and progresives in the whole US?
But not enough progressives to get those homeless drug addicts homes and rehab, so they stop stealing things and shitting in the street.
But even so, those are loosely held ideals as the last few decades have shown that such trivial things will not get in the way of protecting their wealth. Idealism is set aside when it comes to ensuring inexplicable perpetual growth in one's most valuable asset.
That's what I meant. My English is a bit broken.