It’s a big black mark on your reputation, it’s rarely worth it. He could have injured or killed someone for a video.
Crime doesn’t pay
Crime doesn’t pay
Jean Valjean is a character in a novel, not a real person, and is about as relevant to this discussion as a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk.
A.k.a Eugène Vidocq
Nowadays Taliban do hands amputation as punishment for stealing(not sure about stealing bread, though).
The historical element is more relevant. In the UK (and perhaps the US) in 1723 it was made illegal to hunt a rabbit - punishable by death.
How many times have people been fraudulently misled about the scope and responsibilities of their roles? How many times have companies misclassified workers or denied overtime pay? How many times have companies lied about their products and services? How many times have big tech companies conspired to keep wages down? How many private equity and pharmaceutical companies have engaged in profiteering?
They regularly commit crimes. Though the definition of crime is constantly being patched with loopholes by lobbyists and other well-connected jackals. The Overton window keeps on shifting. It's just a power battle between people more powerful than you.
Maybe if he was applying for a job at the FAA, as a pilot, or as a school teacher. but for a professional youtuber, not so much.
That is to say if we rely on the permanent reputation taint as a deterrent then once you’ve been tainted are you not now much more likely to go do more harmful, felonious things?
I don’t know much about felonies though — perhaps they can be expunged after X years of good behaviour?
Justice is not in play here. The punishment should match the crime.
Don't do victimless crimes. If you have already done it, don't cover it up. And if you have to do it all, don't do it stupid.
I'm pretty sure you are more likely to kill someone driving to work today than crashing a plane in some random as forest.