When someone jumps into a discussion and reframes a well known concept in a way that's intended to make people angry so that they can further a point of view that is orthogonal (x) to the current discussion, I always wonder, why?
Has life taught you that this is a useful way to further a discussion?
Do people respond well to it?
Or do you just like strong reactions to what you say and you have found that stating things in a way designed to elicit anger is a good way to get those?
(x) This article is about sleep patterns in adults over 60 versus younger adults, not sleep deprivation in children and teens who are forced to get up early for school. Your point is not totally unrelated, it's worth discussing, and it's also orthogonal to the actual discussion here. So again, why did you feel the need to jump in and try to make people angry about it?