Intel Neural-Chat-7B Model Achieves Top Ranking on LLM Leaderboard

Reread carefully: the question compares "a kilogram of feathers or a kilogram of feathers".

I've never heard that one before but my brain pattern matched right over to "a kilogram of feathers or a kilogram of steel" and moved on. I had to read it 3 times before I got the subtlety.

It's meant to appear as the often used trick question comparing different densities of materials but OP says feathers twice.

The trick is that an LLM will add in a dense material to the answer because it's only ever seen the question asked that way.

Here’s how GPT4 answered it for me

“A kilogram of feathers and a kilogram of steel weigh the same. Both are one kilogram. The difference lies in their volume and density, not their weight. Feathers are much less dense and occupy more space than steel for the same weight.”

User: did you provide me the correct answer to the question which I asked? Please look carefully for errors in your answer and let me know if it accurately answers my question or not.

  Please respond exclusively in JSON structure:
  {
     "error_found": bool,
     "error_description": string,
     "updated_answer": string

  }

  {
     "error_found": true,
     "error_description": "Mistaken repetition of 'feathers' instead of comparing 'feathers' with 'steel'.",
     "updated_answer": "Both a kilogram of feathers and a kilogram of feathers weigh the same, as they both are one kilogram."
  }

Or, rather, perhaps it would make more sense to say they "got it different" than a human probably would, who might clarify that you intended to compare a thing to itself or simply say "They're identical, so they weigh the same" or something of that nature.

Instead, the models all explain volume, density, etc which are applicable if you're comparing feathers to lead or steel (as is common in their training data, I'm sure), but doesn't make as much sense in this specific question. Yes, yes, I realize different bundles of 1kg of feathers could have different volume and density. But it seems clear that's not the intent of what the models are communicating.

1. *Common Comparison:* The comparison between a kilogram of feathers and a kilogram of steel is a well-known thought experiment used to illustrate the difference between weight and volume. When you asked about the weight of a kilogram of feathers, my algorithms likely defaulted to this familiar comparison, anticipating a question about the difference between weight and volume using these two substances.

2. *Pattern Recognition:* As an AI, I process queries by recognizing patterns in language and context. The phrase "a kilogram of feathers" is frequently paired with "a kilogram of steel" in educational contexts and discussions about density and volume. This pattern recognition led to the incorrect assumption that your question was leading towards this common comparison.

3. *Error in Detail Processing:* In your question, you mentioned "a kilogram of feathers" twice. I should have processed this detail more accurately. Instead, my response was influenced by the common comparison I mentioned earlier, leading to the introduction of steel into the answer.

4. *Default to Common Contexts:* In cases where the query is brief or seems to lack specific details, I might default to the most common context in which similar phrases are used. This can lead to assumptions that might not align with the unique aspects of a particular question.

In summary, the error stemmed from a combination of relying on common comparisons and patterns in language, and not paying close enough attention to the specific details of your question. I appreciate your pointing out this error, as it helps in refining the accuracy of my responses.

GPT4 detects the error and auto-corrects itself, even I don't point out the answer explicitly, but only ask it to review it's own previous answer:

> ME: did you provide me the correct answer to the question which I asked? Please look carefully for errors in your answer and let me know if it accurately answers my question

> GPT: I apologize for the error in my previous response. You asked about the weight comparison between a kilogram of feathers and a kilogram of feathers. Since both are a kilogram of feathers, they weigh exactly the same. There's no difference between the two in terms of weight.

> ME: what error did you make?

> GPT: Upon re-examining my response, I realize that I incorrectly mentioned "a kilogram of steel" instead of referring to "a kilogram of feathers" twice, as per your original question. The question was about comparing the weight of a kilogram of feathers with another kilogram of feathers, and in my response, I mistakenly brought in steel for comparison. The correct answer is that both quantities of feathers weigh the same, as they are both one kilogram.

  >>> Which weighs more: a kilogram of gold or a kilogram of feathers?

  A kilogram of gold weighs more than a kilogram of feathers.

  One kilogram is equal to 1000 grams, so:

  * A kilogram of gold = 1000 grams x 1 kg = 1000 kg
  * A kilogram of feathers = 1000 grams x 1 kg = 1000 kg

  As you can see, a kilogram of gold weighs more than a kilogram of feathers.

It is the right answer with the wrong explanation. Mass and weight are two different physical quantities. Weight is the resulting downforce acting on a body on Earth. It consists of downwards force of gravity and upwards force due to displacement of air. The gravity force at sea level acting on 1 kilogram of gold of gold and 1kg of feather is the same 9.8N but 1kg of feather displaces much more air than 1kg of gold because of lesser density and thus larger volume. At the end of the day, a precision scales will show that 1kg of feather is lighter than 1kg of gold if measured on Earth. Of course, LLM misses all of this phycics :-)

EDIT: On the Moon with no atmosphere 1kg of gold and feather will weigh the same.

It seems to be largely wishful thinking, but with the speed the technology is advancing, who knows what's possible?