It looks to me like exactly the kind of investment I would expect a wealthy angel to make in startups related to their interests, not undue bias.
It looks to me like exactly the kind of investment I would expect a wealthy angel to make in startups related to their interests, not undue bias.
I do wonder if this kind of thing was related to his ouster-and-return, but it happened in 2019 so it would need to be a pattern of behavior beyond what we see in the article.
So he has an incentive to do business with a chip maker that he invested in. But that's allowed right? Or is the argument more that it's like insider trading (investing?) because he knew he might announce business with it in the future? Since it's not publicly traded, I don't even know if that's unethical.
It would be very hard to prove that choosing company A over company B was a knowingly worse choice for OpenAI though.
[1] https://www.thestreet.com/investors/sam-altman-net-worth-how...
Also, depending how early he was, he could own significantly more than 5%.
One of those bets is on the fusion power startup Helion Energy, into which he’s poured more than $375 million, he told CNBC in 2021. The other is Retro, to which Altman cut checks totaling $180 million the same year.
“It’s a lot. I basically just took all my liquid net worth and put it into these two companies,” Altman says.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/08/1069523/sam-altm...