What does that even mean?
That it bundles a controller that is not "capable" of handling more than 5 unifi devices? Who comes up with shit like that? Lets punish people that get too dependent on us and tries to buy too many devices. Let's squeeze some more out of them and risk them switching to a competitor instead rather than build a relationship with us.
I've been worried about the future of unifi for my needs. The USG was a good deal. A bit slow (not gbit in routing but decent enough for most, not great VPN performance) but we have been waiting for an upgrade that surely was just around the corner for well over 6 years now YIKES! Feels like it has been out of stock for many years as well so hard to get replacements. The power bricks are starting to die, easy enough to get third party for that but feels like a dead end.
The nicer units are just overkill for most, and are quite hard to justify the cost. The ones targeted for the home do too much.
And just like that, I've missed the replacment(?!): UXG-lite
https://eu.store.ui.com/eu/en/pro/category/all-cloud-keys-ga...
First glance, seems like it is a direct replacement, perfect! Exact same thing but newer and faster. And you get to host your own controller, that is a relief.
These are cheap enough that you can recommend your immediate family to get and then manage centrally in your own network.
Need to do some more research but for once I'm hopeful about ui.
And then they'll be pissed off because it doesn't "do" what they want it to.
This thing is designed for what 95% of household's need. A router and one or two WAPs. That's really it.
The controller should really be off board, or the on-board controller should be tuned to communicate less with the devices it s and write significantly less often to storage.
What I miss the most in their offering is an affordable 6e AP though.
We live in times where lawn movers need wifi.
I have a pretty large house and I would be fine with this - I have three AP's and a 48 port PoE switch for the 36 drops in my house.
isn’t that typically the implicit message being sent by disgruntled customers complaining about a company’s seeming lack of foresight or excess of greed, or both?
Unless all the walls in your house are heavily reinforced concrete, I don't see how you need that many APs.
This kind of setup is easily achievable with UniFI POE gear, but will hit the 5 device limit of this router. The original USG didn’t have this limit.
And even in a brick house a lot of the interior walls are still just plywood or drywall, even in the UK AFAIK.
What is interesting though is that OP said it is sufficient with one AP per floor plus one outside. So apparently propagation within one floor is fine, but between floors or to the exterior is not. In that case, it has to be a building where the interior walls are mostly just drywall, and the exterior walls and floor slabs are reinforced concrete with little in terms of openings. Which sounds more like an apartment building than anything else?
[1] https://www.nist.gov/publications/electromagnetic-signal-att...
We’ve got 3 UniFi APs downstairs here, 2 up. There are still things on the periphery that only just cling on, and when you’ve got stuff like that it takes a lot of airtime.
Having one AP per floor is normal for coverage, so that would be 4 to serve the inside.
The limitation is totally product segmentation, since their prosumer equivalent all in one (the UDR) costs double, but that's fine, I feel. It's not like they're raising the price of the existing offerings because this budget model exists.
I'm not sure what are you trying to say with this - yes, obviously, people who don't buy extra APs don't have extra APs, but why are they relevant to conversation about UniFi prosumer products?
It's not like UniFi customer base is a person who doesn't use anything outside their ISP equpiment.
UniFi has way more options to play around with and functionary rich so I $149 seems quite decently priced.