Factory construction boom in the US
wolfstreet.com
wolfstreet.com
As far as "good enough training to find a good position" if you want an "engineer" job title, get a masters degree from an Accreditation Board of Engineering Technologies (ABET) program. You should be able to do this in two years part time study at a local state engineering school. All state engineering schools are approximately equal in this regard.
My process lends itself to function block programming so generating useful diffs requires quite a lot of effort.
Siemens's TIA Portal you can export the source code to make it readable in git as long as you code in SCL (structured control language, which is really structured text), but it's not automatic and a lot of times the binary blob that is the source code and the exported readable code get out of sync cuz of lack of discipline by the programmer.
Rockwell's Studio 5000 can be readable if you use STL (structured text), may be this has changed though, I haven't used it in a long time.
Programming experiences in the industrial controls world is highly dependent on the brand/platform, the IEC 61131-3 describes the standards for industrial controls programming languages, but each brand implements them in a different way so there really is no standard. Writing structured text in one platform does not guarantee the same code will work in a different platform.
I've been working in this field for quite awhile and the systems can be complex and challenging. The software you write controls equipment that can cause massive damage and even death. This leads to very conservative programming languages and frameworks.
There are also industrial robot programmers who come straight out of high school, get some quick training and go to automotive integrators who contract them out to large automotive companies. This usually requires less engineering knowledge because the industrial robot platforms are relatively easy to learn and what you're doing most of the time is teaching the robot where to go to meet cycle times which is tedious, you use a "pendant" not a laptop usually, but that's changing with all the offline programming software, but reality never matches the simulation.
There reason most people don't like this field is you have to be in the "field", sometimes that's a loud ass, highly dangerous, manufacturing floor, outside in the searing heat or frigid cold, working with people that are.....uh...not the brightest, and work under constant pressure since "controls" is usually the last to get all the specs and the time you get to finish got shortened due to late deliverables from mechanical and electrical. It's not a job you can really do remotely. You can program remotely, but at some point your going to test you code on the machine and you're responsible for not breaking anything or killing anyone.
Finding people who are willing to do proper root cause analysis and not make wild assumptions about everything is pretty much the only important concern for onboarding in most manufacturing*system roles.
You will learn on the job. Go in with an open mind and try to remain humble. Pay will suck at first, but these domains are pretty much limitless in your career potential. I knew of some working in the photolithography area that were virtually classified as a nation state asset. Make yourself that important. You won't get that from college or a certification program. You get that by working with real tools in a real factory and learning about all the strange emergent properties of these systems as they come together.
My manager told me and my colleagues a couple of months ago during our biweekly meeting, that our customers are no longer asking what is the price for our product, but if they can have one. Our planned factory output is increasing from 300 units per year to 600. 2024 and 2025 is already fully booked.
https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=587470601&q=gas+insula...
Fuel and natural gas prices have really made an impact since the sanctions against Russia started. The blowing up of Nord Stream pipelines couldn't have helped, though maybe the impact there wasn't as important as I'd guess seeing as no one bothered to investigate it when the attack happened.
[1] https://www.politico.eu/article/end-made-in-europe-manufactu...
Are you sure?
News coverage at the time made it clear that there weren't active investigations and Sweden effectively blocked any investigation due to national security concerns.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/sweden-shuns-formal-joi...
I know I had seen claims that it was a Ukrainian special forces colonel (or captian?) that called the attack, but those claims I've seen all leaned on released intelligence documents and sources without any mention of an actual investigation of the attack site.
Those claims sounded circumstantial to me as they were only based on intel reports before/after the attack and didn't get to my point that no investigation of the site occurred immediately after the pipes where hit.
Investigations take time but don't necessarily mean they've stalled. The last leaks were from Nov 11, 2023 so less than a month ago so it's hard to call that stall. Sure anybody can just point fingers like Russia did at the UK [2] but then you just look silly when you can't substantiate it.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabo... [2]: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-british-nav...
https://www.marketplace.org/2023/11/21/with-mexico-the-top-u...
It wasn't rocket science, make it advantageous to produce your goods sold in America in America. Economies of scale will follow and make it true that producing goods for export makes sense too, even with the tax hit.
The TCJA could be having a larger impact, with immediate expensing of capital costs and depreciation provisions, but it was also passed 6 years ago.
Holy fuck man, the audacity of Americans.
People like to remember the Battle of New Orleans, except the war was already over. Good thing the Brits were preoccupied with Napoleon.
Not sure if enough happened to count, though.
The Roman Empire also showed plenty of what people would see as obvious signs of decline during what we now call its rise.
The idea that an Empire follows a 3 act trajectory of rise, plateau, and fall is incorrect or at least incomplete. The history of empires is one of multiple waves of expansion and contraction. The peak can only be seen in hindsight.
While you’re in it, you might be able to see the slope, but there’s no way to tell whether you’re headed towards local or global maxima or minima.
If you’d asked a Roman on the street in 53 BC, after a Roman army had been decisively beaten by the Parthians, he probably would have been worried about obvious signs of decline as well, but that was well over a century before what most people think of as the peak of the empire.
That’s not to say America can’t be sliding off of a global maximum, but there’s absolutely no way to tell until it’s over.
My point was that the bare numbers could mislead a bit.
Also perhaps it didn't have to be this way. An awful lot of people have been willing to overlook issues over the decades because it put money in their pockets in the short term. Perhaps if the US had taken a tougher stance on these issues earlier rather than turning a blind eye while they pilled up and reached a breaking point things could have turned out differently.
Post WW2 only one country had nuclear weapons and could've chosen to subjugate the rest of the world if they wanted to.
You act as if there wasn’t a consistent movement the entire time screaming that this was a horrible idea. Even Donald Trump was saying this in the early 90s
The people in power never believed that. That's just how it was marketed to the people whose lives they were destroying.
For more, read "Trade Wars are Class Wars" by Klein and Pettis. The thesis is in the title and the case is convincing.
It seemed to be working in China too until Xi took over.
Introducing The Prince: Searching for Xi Jinping
https://www.economist.com/podcasts/2022/09/07/introducing-th...
Am noob. TIL: One motivation of Xi Jinping's strategic policy shifts is anti-corruption. I can't help but wonder if there were alternatives. Like legislation, enforcement, and strengthening the judiciary.
But I'm noob. If it was just that easy, it probably would have happened.
> It seemed to be working in China too until Xi took over.
Ya. This whole mess just makes me sad. I had really hoped China and USA would continue to grow towards each other.
I think those things are incompatible with a dictatorial regime.
https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-pr....
The choice to get rid of these policies was made by people who fully understood that doing so would pump assets and dump exports, and that the ability to benefit from the asset pump would be concentrated while the fallout from the dumping of exports would be widespread.
I am glad we have reversed direction and hope that it is not too late.
Bonus: Services are not fundamentally productive like manufacturing.
Edit: I mean every country is playing this game, thinking everybody but whites doesn't protect their interest is delusional. Japan had an empire in the past, China is aggressive towards its neighbors now, africa too, and wants Taiwan.
They are focused on their own development, not dealing with a declining hegemony's tantrums over a transition to a multi-polar world.
What this does feel like, is a projection of western insecurities at the principal cause of them. We fear and hate them, and the only rational justification for our behaviour is convincing ourselves that they hate and fear us even more.
That would not be a particularly flattering portrayal.