As to why the West chooses to instrumentalise humanitarian organisations, that's another discussion.
As to why the West chooses to instrumentalise humanitarian organisations, that's another discussion.
"The Russian Red Cross (RKK), together with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), will provide assistance to internally displaced persons in Donbass"
https://www.emergency-live.com/news/the-other-side-of-the-fi...
>to say nothing of the many countries in the Sahel
Red Cross in Mali: https://www.icrc.org/en/where-we-work/africa/mali
Red Cross in Niger: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/operational-update-niger-mo...
Could you explain further?
In other words, show me the Red Cross people who have lost their lives close to the lines of battle in the last 5-10-15 years and I’ll change my opinion. Otherwise, stuff like this just denotes laziness when it comes to investing in real IT security.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/02/10/5145078... - six killed in Afghanistan
https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/two-red-cross-workers-k... - Two Red Cross workers killed in attack in western Mali
I think you might just not be well informed, combined with being too lazy to do a 2 minute web search "red cross workers killed".
I half expect you now to say "yeah, but it isn't that many people", which might be because it is a a WAR CRIME to kill Red Cross workers. Really, seriously smh.