> I think the project missed an opportunity by tying itself so tightly to x86 assembly.
What sort of "opportunity" did authors miss? They're not a business.
Or is writing ARM assembler necessarily more fun than writing x86?
What sort of "opportunity" did authors miss? They're not a business.
Or is writing ARM assembler necessarily more fun than writing x86?
From GP:
> Except you're not going to find a lot of PC hardware this under-powered; these kinds of systems are actually getting more expensive, as they're slowly getting relabeled as "vintage"
Super cool project though of course