Slowing Moore's Law
gwern.net
gwern.net
What I mean is let's say the AI is taught morality from a pure utilitarian standpoint. Then, certain ethical decisions might harm a minority to benefit humanity overall. Is this AI friendly or not? Ethical systems, like all first-order logic, are inconsistent systems, and there will be ambiguities. Good and bad are human concepts that are deeply rooted to a given observer's perspective.
Of course. By friendly I mean friendly from my own perspective, or perhaps also from the perspectives of other people with sufficient overlap to my own conception of good.