Astronomers find six planets orbiting in resonance
astronomy.com
astronomy.com
Also, despite being a huge nerd for astronomical scales, I'm still easily shocked at them. I didn't expect a system to exist with six (!) larger-than-Earth planets in stable sub-Mercury orbits around a sun-like star. My mind tells me there's not enough space, that they should be ripped apart by each other or the star. Yet it's actually one of the most peaceful, gentle systems we've ever found.
So your intuition that they should affect each other is correct, but the end result less catastrophic.
Of course, we don't know how many sibling planets crashed into their sun earlier...
My understanding is that it would be 0. A planet can't fall into its sun without being disturbed, because the planets and their sun all coalesce from the same rotating disc of material. If any planet had been disturbed enough to slow down and crash into the sun, it's hard to imagine that happening without the slightest disturbance to the 6 extant planets.
Space has, like, infinite possibilities.
You shouldn't assume that. With so much synchronicity I have to wonder if it creates any forces that would result in things like wildly high tides if a planet had any water on it, or increased quakes or some other phenomena caused by the alignments. It could be far from peaceful.
And you can change visualizations in the dropdown, there is a special one for Pluto's eccentric orbit :)
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.8504...
The prospect of analyzing aggregate human behavior with recourse to models from physical science immediately put me in mind of the "Chemical Analogue Theory of the Body Politic," as espoused by one of the characters at a dinner party, in Bruce Sterling's _The Artificial Kid_:
--
“The Chemical Analogue Theory is, of course, an analogy,” said Manies. He touched a stud on the heavy bracelet on his right wrist and in rushed his secretary Chalkwhistle, a neuter. Manies took pencil and slate from the neuter and began sketching as he talked. “As you are well aware, dear Saint Anne, the human body is an immensely complex system, in fact an ecosystem with its own flora and fauna. The same is true of the Body Politic, our human society. Their reactions, their structures are very similar. Now, the history of the human body is the history of its organic macromolecules, its linkages (pardon me) of separate atoms. Similarly, the history of the Body Politic is the history of many small groups and coteries, linked groups of friends. Of course, I would not go so far as to equate a single personality with a single atom. In most cases people would be better considered as small molecules; acids, bases, salts, et cetera. I often consider them atoms for simplicity’s sake, however.
“Note that the effect of a single atom in the human body is almost negligible; but if that atom is included in the right molecule, its influence may be crucial! It does not matter which particular atom enters a molecule, you understand; the important thing is that it be the correct kind of atom, and attached in the correct molecular framework! It is the framework that counts, you see, just as the important thing is the relationships within groups of friends, rather than the friends themselves. Of course some atoms are comparatively rare, just as some personality types are comparatively rare, and they can exert a disproportionate influence; but it is the linkages that count.
“I regard myself as an enzyme, constantly endeavoring to link molecular groups into newer and more potent configurations. This breakfast is just such an attempt.”https://fritzo.org/live#a=dmFyIHJhdGlvcyA9IFsyLzMsIDIvMywgMi...
That is a very crowded space in orbit close to this star!
If you go down the rabbit hole of looking at nearby stars and want a jumping off point, I mused some similar observations on another thread here:
The planets in our Solar System don't exhibit this type of resonance (some of their moons do), and we are here, so 'no'
Reduced to 50% speed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uSzL0nPr9M