I would love to see a deep and knowledgeable comparison between them.
This is a feature of many FOSS projects, sadly, and I don't really get what aspect of human nature drives it, but it must be something.
Not counting efforts where someone forks an old version because they don't like where the team are taking the new version (Trinity vs KDE, MATE vs GNOME)...
There are 2 current forks of Mandriva doing much the same: Mageia and OpenMandriva. (There are others but with deeper differences.)
Claws is a fork of Sylpheed, both continuing separately.
Cinnamon, the Zorin OS desktop, and GNOME Flashback are all doing more or less the same things with the same codebase.
Curiosity, Joy, learning, status, …
I can't speak for the kolibrios contributors, but I imagine that to them, the value comes from the development process itself. They do it because they enjoy it. Any practical usefulness of the resulting software is mostly incidental.
If your goal was to develop useful software in 2023, you wouldn't be writing pure x86 assembly within the constraints of a floppy disk.
If the Kolibri OS folks experience unique enjoyment from developing this project that they would not obtain from Menuet OS, then the labor would not be duplicated.
- FVWM from TWM. Much faster and smaller.
- RXVT vs XTerm.
- Slashem from Nethack. You want Discworld references, > Nethack 3.4.3. Fullfilling role, mons and object additions, Slashem.
"Why all these people playing Prince of Persia fight on their own? Why don't they all get together and free the Princesse once and for all?" :-)