In my mind, it just looks like employees have been getting the short stick for so long that they don't even know what fair working conditions look like anymore.
In my mind, it just looks like employees have been getting the short stick for so long that they don't even know what fair working conditions look like anymore.
It tends to be a weird two weeks too. If you know you're quitting you're usually already preparing for it prior— taking less responsibility, finding who to hand projects to, etc. In my experience at times it's just two uncomfortable weeks of showing up and doing nothing.
Personally, if it's a job I really dislike, I don't mind losing the extra $X,000. I've discovered through the years my mental health is worth a lot more. Once you leave a high-paying job for one that pays less, or even to just take a break and earn nothing, you start thinking about these sorts of little extras as inconsequential at best.
If the next job pays more than the last one, you could say it's a net loss for the employee too, since that's an extra two weeks one could've earned more.
But if neither of those apply, it's probably worth it to hang around and get some extra cash, or just get a couple more weeks of hanging at the job with "graduation goggles" and little work stress, yeah.
Also if you just leave it may be harder to get a decent reference from your colleagues for future jobs.
Of course, severance is not universal, but, in my experience in the tech sector, having survived five lay offs at three companies and having been laid off once myself, it has been the case.
We could all be laid off at any time.
But wouldn't you claim that this is not a very common view to hold about the process of quitting, in the US? I've lost count how many times I've heard managers/executives being pissed off because an employee left without a two week notice, and they treat that happening as some sort of failure, instead of just a normal thing.